logo
WhatsAPP
8618221411092

PPWR Heavy Metals: The 100 mg/kg Limit and What to Ask a Supplier

Last reviewed 23 October 2026 · Written by HuanCheer New Protection Material, Jiangsu, China

The 100 mg/kg heavy-metal limit has been mandatory for every packaging material since 12 August 2026. What buyers should actually ask a supplier for — and what a useless answer looks like.

In one line. Article 5(4) of Regulation (EU) 2025/40 caps the combined concentration of lead, cadmium, mercury and hexavalent chromium at 100 mg/kg measured across the packaging unit. It applies to all packaging — paper, plastic, board, metal, glass, composite — with no material-specific exemption, and it has applied since 12 August 2026.

What the limit actually says

The limit is a sum, not four separate limits. Lead + cadmium + mercury + hexavalent chromium, taken together, must not exceed 100 mg/kg (0.01% by weight) in the packaging or any of its components. A packaging unit that is 60 mg/kg lead and 55 mg/kg cadmium fails, even though neither metal breaches 100 on its own.

Three details matter in practice:

  • It is per component, not just per unit. Inks, coatings, adhesives, closures and labels are components. A compliant board with a non-compliant print is a non-compliant unit.
  • It replaced a patchwork. Directive 94/62/EC set the same 100 mg/kg figure, but member states applied it with different derogations and different enforcement. PPWR unified it to a single threshold with no national variation.
  • There is no "non-food contact" relief. The limit covers all packaging regardless of whether it touches food. This is the part that catches transport packaging buyers out, because most of the PPWR commentary they read is about food-contact PFAS.

Where paper stands

Kraft paper from a virgin or well-controlled recycled furnish usually sits far below 100 mg/kg for all four metals. That is a material property, not a compliance position, and the distinction matters.

The realistic risk points for a paper-based cushioning product are not the paper itself:

Inks and varnishes Pigment-grade colourants are the historical source of lead and cadmium in printed packaging. A dark or saturated print is a larger surface area of risk than a light one.
Recycled content Recovered fibre can carry legacy contamination from printed and coated waste streams. This is controllable through furnish selection, but it has to be controlled deliberately.
Adhesives and coatings Lower risk for the four metals than for PFAS, but still part of the bill of materials that a technical file has to account for.
Metal fittings Staples, eyelets, zips and foil blocking. Not typical in paper cushioning, decisive where they appear.

What to ask a supplier, in this order

Most buyers ask "are you compliant?" and accept "yes". That is not a question a supplier can answer honestly across an unknown product range, and it produces nothing a compliance team can file. These four questions do:

  1. Which standard was the test run against? The successor to the 94/62/EC method (EN 13428 lineage, or the equivalent national method) on the base material. A report against an unrelated standard tells you nothing about Article 5(4).
  2. What was tested — base material or finished unit? A report on 80 gsm kraft says nothing about the same kraft after printing. Ask whether the tested sample included print, adhesive and coating, and if not, what covers those.
  3. How old is it? A test report is a snapshot of a production period. Ask for the date and for the retest interval the supplier works to. A 2019 report on a 2026 shipment is a gap, not evidence.
  4. Is the underlying data available, or only a certificate? A certificate with no test data cannot be checked. What you want is the laboratory report — issuing lab, method, sample description, results per element.
The answer that should worry you. "We are SGS certified." There is no such thing as an SGS certification for PPWR heavy metals — SGS is a laboratory that issues test reports, not a certification body that awards a compliance mark. A supplier who says this usually has nothing on file. The useful answer names a lab, a method, a date and a result.

What it becomes in your technical file

Under PPWR, the heavy-metal result is one input to the technical documentation that supports the EU declaration of conformity. It is not a standalone certificate you can wave at an inspector. In a workable file it sits alongside the bill of materials, the recyclability assessment and the minimisation record, and it has to be traceable to a specific product specification rather than to "our paper range".

Practically, that means the useful thing to obtain from a supplier is not a document titled "compliance certificate" but a test report whose sample description matches the product you are buying.

Timing: why this is worth doing before the order, not after

A heavy-metal test is relatively cheap and quick compared with a PFAS screen. That is exactly why it should be requested at sampling stage: it costs almost nothing to ask for when you are already asking for samples, and it becomes an awkward, schedule-blocking request once goods are on the water and a customs authority or a retail compliance team is asking.

The failure mode is not a rejected shipment. It is a buyer's own compliance team refusing to sign the declaration of conformity because one input document is missing — at which point the goods are already in a warehouse in Rotterdam.

 

Talk to the factory
HuanCheer New Protection Material makes honeycomb paper mailers, cushioning rolls and sleeves in Yancheng, Jiangsu. Sizes, GSM and print are made to order; MOQ and lead time quoted per specification.
Browse products   Request a quote